STMasthead.JPG (21846 bytes)

Image4.gif (1281 bytes)

PUBLISHED LETTERS FROM VARIOUS ALLWRIGHTs
bullet

Letters published in the Irish Times

bullet

Letters published in the Irish Independent

bullet

Letters published in The Economist

bullet

Letters submitted but not published in 2006, 2007 and 2008

Topic Date Author

Woman's place in the pulpit

Good cop, bad cop

Why waste money to hear 'no' again ? 

Divided over Robinson role 

Fair trading of online brokers

Letting us eat organic cake

Green 'truths' still go unheard

Smoke in our eyes

Toy Boys

Good Grammar

Goalkeepers' Defence

A Risky Strategy

Probing Questions 

Mothers Excused

Warning Shot

Courage Misplaced

Lent is not a "feast"

A drop too much

Food for thought

Hydraulic Fracturing

Notes not the answer

Increasing prices and drink

Dev Óg: Silence is golden

Facial Awareness

Choice Words

Hunt for Evidence (and response)

Nations United by Misogyny

Blame Game

Hide and Seek

Alcohol Proof

8th March 1987

Mid-1990s

24thJune 2001

1st April 2001

11th November 2001

14th July 2002

18th August 2002

8th December 2002

10th August 2003

4th January 2004

15th February 2004

31st July 2004

30th April 2006

12th November 2006

3rd December 2006

13th January 2008

7th September 2008

25th October 2008

4th July 2010

9th October 2011

6th November 2011

15th January 2012

13th May 2012

12th January 2013

28th July 2013

17th November 2014

16th February 2014

30th March 2014

3rd August 2014

15th January 2017

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony ("TA")

Tony

Tony

Frances

Walter

Walter

Walter

Tony

Tony

Walter

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

Tony

horizontal rule

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 8th MARCH 1987

Woman's place in the pulpit

TUDOR TWIST : In support of Dr Leonard's stand against the ordination of women in the Church of England, Alan Hart (Letters, February 22nd) said "we don't adapt the gospel of Christ just because of society's present standards". 

But wasn't it precisely for this reason that the Church of England was created in the first place, when "present standards" in the form of Henry VIII did not find it convenient to follow the gospel of Christ over divorce. 

Anthony Allwright, The Hague, The Netherlands

suntimes1987.jpg (73719 bytes)

Return to Index

horizontal rule

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 6th AUGUST 1995

Return to Index

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 1st April 2001

http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2001/04/01/stiireilt01001.html

maryrobinson.gif (479758 bytes)

Divided over Robinson role

DAVID QUINN is one of the few commentators to dare to voice views that do not adulate Saint Mary Robinson (Robinson did not live up to expectations at the UN, Comment, last week).

Robinson's decision to leave her post as the United Nations high commissioner for human rights was her latest act of funk, in which she comes across as a self-promoter devoid of inner strength.

Outrageously, she quit the presidency of Ireland several weeks before completing the six-year term the people had graciously bestowed upon her.

And why? Because of a juicier job offer from the United Nations.

Now, after four years with the UN, she is running away again, this time because of "the failure to give her office sufficient resources ".

As high commissioner, she was not some lowly civil servant powerless to resist the unreasonable demands of her boss. She was a member of the highest ruling body of the UN. It was her job to balance resources with activities, to wangle more of the former or trim the latter or whatever, and still get the job done.

It is disingenuous of her to now give the impression that she was some kind of minion subject only to the whims of some higher being.

We are now told her "preferred role as an outspoken advocate of human rights", that is, somebody who makes brave speeches from the sidelines without any responsibility for executing her own advice or for the outcomes.

Tony Allwright
Killiney, Dublin

Return to Index

horizontal rule

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 24th JUNE 2001

http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2001/06/24/stiireilt01002.html

Why waste money to hear 'no' again ?

The Taoiseach, most of his cabinet and all of their European counterparts, are understandably horrified by the no result. It causes embarrassment for the Irish ministers and enormous irritation to the rest.

But their collective reaction is illuminating. They all say the ratification process will continue and that the treaty will not be renegotiated despite Ireland's no. They are clearly mired in denial, the first of the classic four steps with which people deal with unwelcome news. However, in a short time, we will see denial change to anger, followed in due course by acceptance, and finally by action.

Tony Allwright
Killiney, Dublin

Return to Index

horizontal rule

URL is unbelievably long, and you have to subscribe to the Sunday Times to read it in full.  http://www.newsint-archive.co.uk/pages/SearchSampleResults.asp?pubsel=SNT&SrchText=send+them+a+sterling+draft&datetype=1m&DateFromDD=Day&DateFromMM=Month&DateFromYY=Year&DateToDD=Day&DateToMM=Month&DateToYY=Year&ResultListMax=100&head=&byline=&sect=&SortOrder=desc&SortField=Date&Submit1=Search&BackDD=Day&BackMM=Month&BackYY=Year&source=thetimes&SortField=Pub&SortOrder=asc&SortField=EDN&SortOrder=asc&SortField=Page&SortOrder=asc&ST=NS&SortSpec=&ResultMaxDocs=100&Site=ALL&Collection=NI&ResultCount=20&summreqd=yes&indexkey=3E340769478526514202E230

The Sunday Times
SUN 11 NOV 2001
Ed: 1RP
Pg: Eire Money 2
Word Count: 275

Newspaper.jpg (281404 bytes)

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 11th November 2001

Fair trading of online brokers; Money matters

 

TA writes from Dublin: I read your reply to 'DF from Dublin' who wants to open accounts with a few British online stockbroking companies - I disagree with your complicated, costly advice. Your reader can easily open an account with www.etrade.co.uk - one of the few UK online stockbrokers that does not insist on its
customers being UK residents.

As for paying them, you just need to send them a sterling draft, obtainable from any Irish bank. E-Trade's fees are cheaper than Goodbody's - a flat UK£ 14.95, compared with IR£ 20-75 that you quote for Goodbody.

I am a very satisfied customer of E-Trade.

Clip at left includes the reply

Return to Index

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 14th July 2002

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,2088,00.html
but you have to subscribe at £39.99 per year to access the letter below on-line

Letting us eat organic cake

organicfood.jpg (95472 bytes)
I was much encouraged by one of your headlines "Organic food prices plunge" (News, July 7th) because it suggested that, at last, the benefits of organic food are becoming accessible to those unable to afford the premium they have hitherto commanded, only to read that the plunge in prices is actually bad news because a handful of organic farmers, including Prince Charles, are whinging.

Then John Humphrys rabbits on upon the same theme - that the organic farmers are more important than the organic eaters, and preposterously suggests that the organic revolution is about to peter out. Where is the logic ? Organic foods have become so popular that supermarkets are stocking them, prices are falling and more and more people are eating them and presumably the health of the nation is benefiting. And this is supposed to be bad news ?

Tony Allwright
Killiney, Dublin

Editor's deletions shown

Return to Index.

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 18th August 2002

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,2088,00.html <<-- Not correct !
but you have to subscribe at £39.99 per year to access the letter below on-line.  Also, it appears only in the Irish (not the UK) edition.  

Green 'truths' still go unheard

Kyoto18802.jpg (154945 bytes)
John Humphrys derides George Bush for "wrecking" the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change and points to the need "to get clean drinking water to the 1.2 billion people who do not have it" (Comment, last week)These two issues are linked, but not in the way Mr Humphrys might think

The experts, according to their publications, agree (as do even  groups such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth) that implementing Kyoto world-wide will have negligible impact. It will merely defer global warming by six years in a century's time, ie without Kyoto the temperature will rise by 1.9 deg C in 2094, with Kyoto it will not rise by this amount until 2100 [Refs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. 

Experts also inform us that the global cost of reducing CO2 emissions to achieve this derisory benefit will be in the order of US$ 100 billion per annum between now and 2094, or 2% of World GDP [Ref 7].  Of course Kyoto is just the first step, the advocates say. But it's also the cheapest - that's why it's the first - so you can make your own guesses about how many trillions are needed before the impact on global warming becomes significant. Another 30 Kyotos according to some [Ref 8])

And whom is the prevention of global warming supposed to help ? The rich first-world that can well afford air-conditioning and other mitigating comforts and whose agriculture will probably be better off in a warmer climate ? Or impoverished people in the destitute Third World already sweltering in jungles and deserts ? If the latter, then surely there is a better use of US$ 100 billion per annum than something that will give them marginal relief in years time.

For example, Kofi Annan and the World Bank tell us that US$ 200 billion, ie just two year's "subscription" to Kyoto, is sufficient to provide all humanity with clean drinking water and sanitation and thereby avoid 2 million deaths per year in the Third World [Refs 9,10].

It's about time we allhave done.

Tony Allwright
Killiney
, Dublin

References
bulletRef 1 : T M Wigley, 1998, "The Kyoto Protocol: CO2, CH4 and Climate Implications", Geophysical Research Letters 25(13):2, 285-8
bulletRef 2 : Richard Benedick, 1998, "How workable is the Kyoto Protocol ?", Weathervane, http://www.weathervane.rff.org/pop/pop5/benedick.html
bulletRef 3 : Science magazine, 19 Dec 1997, Section 1, p10
bulletRef 4 : Bill Hare, Greenpeace International, "Undermining the Kyoto Protocol: Environmental Effectiveness versus Political Expediency?", p5, http://archive.greenpeace.org/~climate/politics/reports/riia1.pdf
bulletRef 5 : Kate Hampton, Climate Change Campaign Coordinator, Friends of the Earth, "The Kyotol Protocol Survives, Battered, Bruised, but Still Important", Link July/September 2001, http://www.foei.org/publications/link/98/e982700.html
bulletRef 6 : John Weyant and Jennifer Hill, 1999, "Introduction and Overview", The Energy Journal, Kyoto Special Issue : xxxiii-xxxiv, BEA 2001b-c
bulletRef 7 : Jerry Mahlman of Princeton University, in Science magazine, 19 Dec 1997, 278:2,048
bulletRef 8 : Kofi Annan, 2000, "Progress Made in Providing Safe Water Supply and Sanitation for all During the 1990s – Report of the Secretary-General", p5, UN Economic and Social Council, Commission on Sustainable Development, 8th session; http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd8/wss4rep.pdf
bulletRef 9 : World Bank, 1994, "World Development Report 1994 – Investing in Health", p11, 83, Oxford University Press

horizontal rule

PS – For readability, you may wish to omit the references; I include them only for completeness and integrity.

Editor's deletions shown

Return to Index

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 8th December 2002 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2088-506196,00.html

Smoke in our eyes

NO CURE: You report that 360,000 Britons per year require hospital treatment at a cost of about £1.7 billion. Even if the tax on a packet were only £1 and those sick people smoked a packet a day, it would mean that they pay for their own medical treatment in just 13 years. But cigarettes take far longer than 13 years to make smokers sick, not every smoker gets sick, the tax is far in excess of £1 per packet, and smokers die disproportionately younger than non-smokers, thus drawing less in pensions.

A successful anti-smoking campaign would have dire consequences on the exchequer and would necessitate compensating tax rises and/or cuts in services such as hospitals.

So next time you see smokers, smile at them and thank them for their self-sacrifice that so benefits the rest of us.  

Tony Allwright
tony@tallrite.com

Return to Index

Sunday August 10, 2003
The Observer


THE OBSERVER, 10th August 2003

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,6903,1015680,00.html 

Has Rachel Cooke, with her distaste of the toy boy concept, actually looked at men of Elizabeth Taylor's age ? Can she really imagine that a woman of such verve and vitality could consider having a relationship with any man over 50 - unhealthy, pot bellied, humourless, burnt out and angry - well, most of them.

I have this theory that in cave dwelling times, no man expected to live for long - they were too busy out hunting and getting gored to death. Still stuck in that mindset they have not learnt to take their health seriously. And then these pitiful worn-out creatures expect to excite the likes of Joan Collins.

Really, Rachel, be realistic.

Frances Allwright
Dublin

Return to Index

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 4th January 2004

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/0,,2762-950604,00.html

GOOD GRAMMAR: Humphrys asks: “How did ‘between you and I’ ever happen?” I have been boring my family, and any others who would listen, as to the origins of this common solecism. 

In the 1920s and 1930s when education began to make people aware of the requirement for “correct speech” parents would correct their children when they said: “John and me went to the pictures”. They were told to always say, “John and I went to the pictures”. 

Without an understanding of the grammatical reason for this word form, the children would form the impression that “me” is wrong and “I” is right and to be used in all circumstances. Oddly, even well educated people still use the “I” form totally unaware of their error. Bring back English grammar into the schools, I say. 

Walter Allwright
Dublin 

Return to Index

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 15th February 2004

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2094-1001627,00.html

What is it about professional goalkeepers that they rarely seem able to defend adequately when faced by one-on-one encounters with attacking players? Their only defence appears to be to stretch themselves out with arms and legs extended in the usually vain hope that attackers will trip over them and miss shooting for goal. Any rugby player will tell you that the way to prevent your attacker kicking on the loose ball is to dive on it. Soccer clubs should seriously consider recruitment of experienced rugby players, preferably full-backs, to be retrained as goalkeepers.

Walter Allwright, Dublin 4

From the 
SPORT
Letters
column

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return to Index

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 31st July 2004

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-1501-1714834,00.html

A RISKY STRATEGY

Letter to the Sunday Times, 31st July 2005A RISKY STRATEGY: The shooting dead of an innocent person in London has predictably raised howls of accusations. It was an unhappy incident but I would praise the officer for his selfless behaviour. If, as he believed, he was chasing a suicide bomber, he put his own life at risk. Imagine the outcry if the police had failed to apprehend the suspect and scores of people were killed.

Those same do-gooders would have been among the first to accuse the authorities of incompetence, and would have called for heads to roll.

Walter Allwright, Dublin

Return to Index

THE SUNDAY TIMES, 30th April 2006 - Comments

Points

PROBING QUESTIONS: So Giles Hattersley reckons Sue Lawley is a probing interviewer because she “asked Gordon Brown if he was gay” and “got Ted Heath to say the latter years of his political life had “a certain loneliness and sense of waste”.” Probing would have been to switch these questions around. — Tony Allwright, Dublin.

Item to which this letter refers ... 
My next request? Get me off the island
Giles Hattersley talks to Sue Lawley (presenter of the BBC's Desert Island Discs, 16th April 2006

Return to Index

The Sunday Times, 12th November 2006 P!

Mothers Excused

India Knight has misread the main issue surrounding the murder of a child by its parent (Murderously self-pitying fathers, News Review, November 5th 2005).

A killer father such as Gavin Hall may indeed see himself as a victim, but society, the media and the courts do not, and there is no compunction in locking him up for the vile crime he has committed. In Hall’s case that means life, and one might expect that the Greek courts will hand down something similar to John Hogan, who jumped off a balcony with his children in his arms, resulting in his son’s death.

By contrast, when the killer is the mother, she elicits only sympathy from the same troika for the “tragic circumstances” that drove her to the deed and she usually, to all intents and purposes, gets off.

For example, Danielle Wails, who burnt her son to death (what a horrible way to die) apparently to win back his father, recently got off with a three-year community order because she was suffering post-natal depression.  A Bangladeshi woman, Musammat Mumtahana, hanged her two baby sons yet because she then hanged herself it's called a tragedy rather than the foul double murder it was. Sharon Grace (estranged from her husband) drowned her two little daughters and herself in Wexford. This too was not called a foul double-murder, but a “tragic drowning” with - to boot - some people blaming social services.

There are other recent examples of society's different attitude to killer-parents depending on their sex.

It's as if, within the UK and Ireland at any rate, when Mummy's the murderess, we couldn't care less about the dead little innocents.

Tony Allwright
Killiney, Co Dublin

Deletions from my original text were made by the letters editor. 
(Note in particular that it's apparently ok to criticise English and Irish mothers but not Bangladeshi ones.)

The letter is based on my recent post
Murdering Your Own Children.

Return to Index 

The Sunday Times, 3rd December 2006 P!

WARNING SHOT

Brenda Power assesses the proposed legislation to permit householders to “shoot to kill” when faced by an intruder (Comment, last week [Licence to kill means licence to be killed]). If it is legally necessary for the owner of a dangerous dog to post a sign warning “Beware of the dog”, then “Beware of guns” should also be de rigueur. — Walter Allwright, Pembroke Park, Dublin 4.

Return to Index

Published in the Sunday Times on 13th January 2008 - not available online

Courage Misplaced P!

Sir, - It is not the [Irish] Labour party that requires the courage to table a private members' bill in favour of abortions, so much as the unborn children who need the courage to face the resultant abortions.  (Courage on abortion, Comment, January 6th, p1.16 - not available online). — Tony Allwright, Killiney, Co Dublin

Return to Index

Not available onlinePublished in the Sunday Times on 7th September 2008
- not available online

Lent is not a "feast" P!

Sir, - Matt Cooper talks about "the Catholic feast of Lent" (No place for faith in state classrooms, 31 August, page 1-14, Irish edition**).  He must have been looking out of the window during his religious education classes at school.  Lent is a season of fasting and abstinence emulating the forty days that Jesus spent fasting in the wilderness on retreat, prayer and reflection.  It is no more a "feast" than is Islam's current month of Ramadan, which is of course a copy of Lent.  - Yours etc,

**also not available online

Return to Index

 Published in the Sunday Times (Irish edition) on 25th October 2009
- not available online

Not available onlineA drop too much

To justify the proposed reduction of the drink-drive blood-alcohol limit from 80 to 50 mg per 100ml, you  report that according to HSE research at least 18 drivers killed in crashes between 2003 and 2005 had a blood alcohol level of between 50mg and 80mg (Rural rebellion on drink-drive limit, News, last week).

On its own, this statistic proves nothing. The same research also concludes that 165 drivers were killed with zero alcohol in their system. A few months earlier the HSE told us that over 1990-2006, 65% of road deaths were unrelated to alcohol. You could therefore conclude that sober drivers are more dangerous than drunks.

The truth is that no-one has ever demonstrated any increase in accidents attributable solely to a blood alcohol level of between 50 and 80mg. The proposed reduction from 80 to 50mg is all about ideology and self-preening and has nothing to do with road safety.

Return to Index

 Published in the Sunday Times (Irish edition) on 4th July 2010
- not available onlineSTimes-4July2010

To view what was edited out, click here.

Return to Index

Hydraulic Fracturing [P!
Published in the Sunday Times  (Irish edition) on 9th October (available online but behind firewall)

To view what was edited out, click here.

Return to Index

Notes not the answer  [P!]
Letter published in the Sunday Times on 6th November
(available online but behind paywall)

Return to Index

Pay to view link: http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/news/ireland/article856828.ece

Return to Index

 

About time Dev Óg was put in his place: Silence is golden
Letter published in the Sunday Times  on 13th May 2012 [but behind a paywall]

Sir, / I am shocked. Not content with silencing five priests, the Catholic church has now silenced Father Éamon Ó Cuív for daring to speak out against the sacred Fiscal treaty. Should he violate his pledge of silence, Bishop Micheál Martin will throw him out of the Church.

Oh wait, did I say church? I meant Fianna Fail, where gagging a member is apparently not shocking; just a sensible precaution to ensure the corporate message goes out. / Yours etc,

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return to Index

 

 

Sunday Times Letters

28th July 2013

 

Return to Index

Hunt for Evidence (and response)

Published in Sunday Times on 17 Nov 2014 (but hard copy mislaid)

Sir, I trust you will invite Brian O'Connell, John Hunt's biographer, to respond to Erin Gibbons' most recent scurrilous, evidence-free attempt to blacken the name of the late John Hunt, art collector, dealer and philanthropist ("Hunt's legacy long overdue for review", November 10th).

For the past nine years, she and Shimon Samuels of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Geneva have tried every trick in the book to accuse Hunt

bullet

of dealing in Nazi-looted art,

bullet

of being a Nazi sympathiser,

bullet

of being on the run from
British intelligence,

bullet

of being on the watchlist
of Irish intelligence,

yet have failed to produced a single scrap of credible evidence, despite persistent requests that they document their allegations.

To the contrary, all evidence uncovered so far, and the world experts who have examined the issue, point unflinchingly to the precise reverse.

Yours etc,

Tony Allwright
Killiney, Co Dublin

Erin Gibbons' response

Return to Index

 

McCarthy's article

 

 

 

Cooper's article

 

 

 
 
Sunday Times, 15Jan17  

Return to Index