 |
| Blog |
 |
| Archive |
|
|
|
|
| Blog |
| To find an archived article, simply click on Index and scroll the subject titles, or do a Ctrl-F search |
TALLRITE BLOG
You can write to me at
blog2-at-tallrite-dot-com |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| “Ill-informed and Objectionable” Comment by an anonymous reader | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
December 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
ISSUE #200 - 6th December 2009 [315+1617=1932] Just for fun, the latest Rasmussen poll on President
Barack Obama’s popularity will |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Celebrating |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Climategate Scandal - Bye-bye Nopenhagen
The reason is simple but horrible. I am old enough to remember the original Watergate which destroyed the Nixon presidency in 1974. His re-election campaign sent a gang to break into the Watergate Hotel to steal documents from the rival Democratic Party. The hotel name entered the lexicon as a byword for reprehensible behaviour and has spawned countless “gates” ever since. Its notoriety derived not so much from the break-in or use of the stolen documents, as from the attempted cover-up which ensued. It’s always the cover-up and damage limitation that attract the greatest opprobrium. Just look at what’s going on right now in the Catholic Church in Ireland. Outrageous and inexcusable as the clerical sexual abuses themselves were, what has really enraged people is the Church’s strenuous and disgraceful efforts to hide these heinous crimes over the years and in so doing facilitate their continuance. Despite efforts by much of the media and conventional wisdom to suppress or downplay its significance, the climate change movement is slowly becoming engulfed in a “gate” of its own, for which it has no coherent answer. Last month an anonymous hacker downloaded an enormous amount of correspondence spanning decades from the anodyne-sounding Climatic Research Unit. The CRU, a state-funded department of the University of East Anglia, is the world’s foremost authority in gathering and analysing historic climate change data. The CRU has provided, over the years, a huge amount of material for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to build into the four assessment reports it has issued since 1990, along with its numerous other reports, technical papers and technical material. The IPCC is regarded by many as the world’s foremost authority on climate change issues. It is the bedrock of the movement. The stolen e-mails, whose authenticity the CRU has confirmed, paint however a horrifying picture as to how it has conducted its climate business. It turns out that at even the highest levels of seniority, strenuous efforts have been made to suppress data and opinions which fail to confirm the climate change hypothesis that the globe is warming due to human-generated emissions of carbon dioxide and other gases. Some examples.
The Daily Telegraph has reproduced some of the raciest quotations from the hacked e-mails. Further information and analysis are still emerging, but the nature of the CRU outrage and what it means for the integrity of the climate change movement can no longer be in doubt. Watergate was a scandal involving an illegal break-in followed by a shocking cover-up of the break-in. “Climategate” is a scandal involving an illegal break-in which has however revealed a shocking cover-up of scientific information in order to promote an anthropogenic global-warming conclusion. Meanwhile, Al Gore’s double-Oscar-winning, Nobel-prize-winning movie “An Inconvenient Truth” is steadily being debunked as a collection of “Inconvenient Untruths”, the process accelerated by Climategate. Some Hollywood types are even demanding that his two Oscars be rescinded, while he himself, to many the spiritual father of global warm-mongering, has chickened out of showing up in Copenhagen, or Nopenhagen as some wags put it. Climategate is not a trivial issue. In my first ever blog two hundred issues ago, I mentioned that experts had put the total global cost of reducing CO2 to meet Kyoto commitments at $100 billion per year for a century. I don’t know the latest figures but with inflation both in costs and in expectations at Copenhagen, this number is unlikely to reduce. It aggregates to ten trillion dollars, money that would be taken out of everyone’s pockets and would therefore be unavailable for other causes whether fighting poverty and disease or wealth-creating capital investment or simply day-to-day consumption. By way of comparison, the UN and World Bank have told us that $200 bn is sufficient to provide all humanity with clean drinking water and sanitation and thereby avoid two million deaths per year in the developing world. I know which way I would prefer my money to be spent. Climategate demonstrates that there has been such a pervasive atmosphere of scientific fraud within the CRU for so many years, that no-one can have confidence any longer in whatever it says or has said, nor in any conclusions others might draw from its material. How is someone to separate the wheat from the chaff? Climategate undermines the whole case for climate change and makes a nonsense of the upcoming COP15 conference. It’s going to end up as bye-bye Nopenhagen I reckon. The truth is bound to enter the consciousness of the general public before too long. Amazingly, however, people want to go to Copenhagen to protest against (mythical) climate change rather than against the climate change fraud that COP15 will attempt to perpetuate. And if you are wondering what is the real incentive for the Climategate fraud, consider these numbers, that I included in a post last year entitled “Global Warm-mongers Keep on Scamming”. According to the august US Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works in 2007,
Meanwhile, Al Gore, for one, had about a million dollars in the bank when he left the Vice Presidency in 2000 and began his global warm-mongering campaign. His worth is now approaching a billion. Go figure. The numbers answer the question.
Hate-isms Are Only for the Approved Victim Groups When recently reading a mealy-mouthed apology by the rabidly left-leaning Israel-hating New Statesman for an anti-Semitic cover cartoon it ran way back on 14 January 2002, I happened upon this remarkable sentence:
In a stroke, it trivialises and thus legitimises all instances of white racism, thereby exonerating people like Louis Farrakhan, Jeremiah Wright, Robert Mugabe, for their overtly anti-white leanings. No matter what you say against white people, now matter how you discriminate against honkies, no matter how publicly you disparage the palefaces in thought word or deed, you are, according to the New Statesman, totally unable to perpetrate a racist act of any sort. And it turns any white who is glad to be white into an automatic racist because he doesn’t want to turn brown or black. The modern anti-white interpretation of the otherwise neutral word racism is quite remarkable, but it appears to set a template for the contemporary fashion of “hate-isms”. If a National White Police Association were to be formed there would be uproar over its overt racism. Yet no-one blinks at Britain’s National Black Police Association, or America’s National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives or National Black Police Association, which in concept are just as racist. Consider a few others examples : Sexism. Does anyone seriously consider that actions which disadvantage males (ineligible to join the Women’s Institute, child allowance paid to the mother not the father, state-funded clinics for breast-check but not prostrate-check) would be regarded as sexist? Of course not. A woman is incapable of acting in a sexist way against men. Only men are capable of sexism (hence the fury among Irish feminists when Ireland’s Supreme Court recently ruled that a men-only golf club could remain so.) Women frequently demand female quotas for particular jobs - parliamentary representation and board room seats in particular. Even though such demands inherently demean all women by declaring that they possess insufficient talent and appeal to succeed on their own, no-one wants to point out that such quotas are blatantly sexist in that they discriminate against men. Last month Ireland appointed as its next EU Commissioner Máire Geoghegan-Quinn “ahead of other well-qualified candidates” just because she’s a woman, in other words not on her own merits. This was in obeisance to the instruction of European Commission president José Manuel Barroso: “I would ... urge you to pay particular attention to the presence of women in the college [of Commissioners]”. How humiliated she must feel as she takes up her new role; how the male Commissioners will snort in derision behind her back. And the same goes for the never-elected-to-anything Baroness Catherine Ashton, the EU’s new Lisbon-enabled Foreign Minister or whatever she’s called. As President Sarkozy put it, she got the job because she’s a female centre-left Brit, certainly not because she has superior ability, much less any expertise in foreign affairs where her experience is zilch. This kind of humiliation is all a natural consequence when only one kind of sexism is acknowledged Ageism This is something invented to allow older people to whinge when they are compulsorily retired or when younger workers are promoted ahead of them or paid more. If you’re in your twenties, try seeing how far you get when you point out that it’s ageist for over 65s to get the bus-pass (paid for out of your taxes) just because they’re over 65 and you’re not. It’s just not possible for an older person to behave in an ageist fashion against a youngster. And if you try to argue that you shouldn’t have to subsidize old folk solely because they haven’t bothered to prepare for their own old age during the 50 long years that were available to them, well then that proves you’re just an ageist. Blasphemy There is great excitement these days about blasphemy as people conclude it is wrong to denigrate another’s choice of religion, even though unlike skin colour it is no more than a personal choice. Ireland’s 1937 Vatican-approved constitution, the EU’s oldest after Belgium’s, forbids blasphemy (the Christian variety, obviously) yet it was only this year that the Justice Minister, scrabbling for something to fill his time, decided to create a law proscribing it. So that means no more ridiculing of God, Jesus, Buddha, Yahweh, Shiva, Krishna and all the other gods and saints that people like to worship. What’s that? I forgot a pair? Allah and Mohammed? I think you get my drift. For in fact all this abhorrence about blasphemy is directed solely at those last two. If you make fun of the others, draw cartoons about them, configure them in jars of urine, blow up 1500-year-old world heritage statues of them, everyone is perfectly cool. Some crazy religious nuts might be offended but who cares - they should get a life. Oh, but express the slightest negative observation about Allah or Mohammed and you are immediately a culturally insensitive boor who deserves the full weight of the law to descend upon you, if a scimitar hasn’t sawn your head off first. In today’s craven world, it is impossible to blaspheme against any religion but Islam. Last month a cover of the Economist illustrated this neatly, with a fauxtograph of Jesus with high explosives rocketing him into the sky, as compared to Mohammed the Dane, with the high explosives under his hat. One image is OK, the other is not (and has never been reproduced in the Economist).
Which brings us to Islamophobia, not Christianophobia, not Judeaophobia, not Hinduphobia, not Shintuphobia, not Taophobia, not even atheophobia or agnosticophobia. It seems when it comes to religion there is only one that merits the tag phobia. Curiously though, Islamophobia means only that you the infidel fear Islam, which should surely be a cause of rejoicing for Muslims rather than objecting. But the word is used, incorrectly, to mean hatred, a very different human feeling. Misosislam would be more accurate as this prefix means not fear but hate (as in misogyny, hatred of women). Nevertheless the point remains - though shalt be free to hate any religion but Islam. Anti-Semitism: This
is especially interesting because it does not exist. It is today
perfectly acceptable to express your hatred of and disdain for Jews all
you like so long as you cloak this with the thinnest of veneers.
This usually means that you must object not to Jews but only to the current
Israeli government or Israel itself or the shadowy pro-Zionist cabals that bribe Western
governments, bankers, businessmen and media. Sometimes it is
sufficient merely to say you despise
“neo-cons” (because some have names like Woflowitz, Perle, Feith and no doubt
Shylock). Thus the Guardian
newspaper not only regularly berates Israel, but fosters a
“Comment
is Free”
debating line which is rife with Of course Muslims need not be circumspect at all, as the rest of the world regards their brand of anti-Semitism not as real anti-Semitism but as just another attractive facet of their rich cultural inheritance. For example,
Everyone - even the most rabid Jihadists - denies being anti-Semitic; they just don’t like Israel and the pigs and apes that inhabit it. Anti-Semitism? What anti-Semitism? Homophobia While I must admit I have not known (in either the Biblical or non-Biblical sense) many uncloseted gays and lesbians, neither have I known them ever to express any contempt or hatred for straight people. Good for them, because the reverse is not true. Nevertheless, for purely academic purposes it would be interesting to meet a group of homosexuals who despised me just because I am different from them. For would that not be just as heinous as hating gays because they’re gay. However, I can’t see myself getting much sympathy, much less redress from the courts, for complaining that a bunch of lesbians and ladyboys jeered at me for being straight. Anyone heard of the Straight Police Association, to promote the interests of non-gay cops? I thought not, and you never will. But there is a perfectly respectable European Gay Police Association, a “Eurogay” outfit and in the UK a Gay Police Association, all devoted to looking after the interests of gay police officers. Now the Irish Garda Siochana are about to recognize Group G, a network for lesbian, gay and bisexual members of the police. Nobody objects to the discriminatory nature of these organizations. These few examples illustrate that homophobia (or misohomo as it should properly be called) is only allowed to be a one-way street. Indeed, even a declaration that you are grateful to be straight rather than homosexual contains within it a nuance of homophobia in today’s touchy environment. _______________ So let me sum up. I am a white hetero male Christian, who is glad to possess those attributes. I dislike the religion and ideology of Islam because of the brutality and fascism it preaches and I dislike anti-Christian blasphemy because I am a Christian. I don’t think oldsters should receive perks funded by but not available to younger taxpayers. Thus if only I were young again, I could truly be described as an ageist, racist, sexist, misoislamist, misoblasphemist, to which some might (incorrectly) add misohomo. But I am a little too old to be a true ageist any longer so I will just have to glory in the other five hate-isms. Oh to be an elderly, African, female, anti-Semitic (secretly gay) Muslim sawing the head off a Mohammed cartoonist. There would be no end to the scope of my immunity and my victimisation. Hate-isms operate in only one direction. The approved groups alone are privileged to find themselves never on the delivery side of hate-isms; they are always the lucky victims.
Who am I? I am Adolf Hitler. Source: Barry O'N If you were thinking of another charismatic national leader you should be concerned, very concerned! Co-incidentally ...
What’s with the world’s SuperBower? Does he really believe that grovelling before dictators and hereditary emperors somehow enhances the standing (so to speak) of the world’s oldest constituted democracy? He seems to have warmed up in London during his first presidential visit to Europe with with an absurd “reach across the aisle” handshake gesture to Communist China’s illegitimate dictator Hu Jintao.
France’s little squirt Sarkozy then shows him, with a smirk, how “reaching across the aisle” is supposed to work when dealing with illegitimate dictators.
Undaunted, the SuperBower than got down (down being the operative word) to real business when he was graciously granted a few moments of precious one-to-one time with Abdulla the illegitimate tyrant of Saudi Arabia. How Sarkozy and Spain’s Zapatero enjoyed the moment; as you can see they could scarcely contain their derisive laughter.
Then it was onwards and downwards to Japan where the Chosen One was granted another audience with an Exalted Presence . Here it was to the world’s only emperor, Akihito, (unelected) incumbent of the world’s oldest (1350 years) hereditary monarchy, that the SuperBower rendered homage, stooping even lower than to that illegitimate Arab despot.
Not content with semi-prostrating himself before dictators and emperors, the SuperBower then decided, perhaps in a fit of atypical egalitarianism, that he needed to extend his kowtows to a wider group of beneficiaries slightly lower down in the hierarchy of illegitimate despotic power.
Who can make sense of all this outreach, bowing, scraping, prostrating and kowtowing to individuals who (all but one) have - unlike the US president - no legitimate right to hold the positions they hold, never having been granted the assent of the peoples on whom they impose their tyrannical rule? Well, it seems Michael Ramirez can. He is a brilliant two-time Pulitzer Prize winning editorial cartoonist for Investors Business Daily. He provides the real explanation. Americans, observe and weep. While the rest of us cringe in sympathetic embarrassment at the antics of the ignorant juvenile man you (so foolishly) elected as president. On whom will he next bestow his insulting grovel?
World SuperBower indeed. Confession: + + + + +
Whoops! Here goes the SuperBower again, Merry Christmas to all my readers.
White House Gate Crashers - and “Human Error” We all enjoyed the story about Tareq and Michaele Salahi, the polo-playing society couple from Virginia, who with extraordinary chutzpah blagged their way into Barack Obama’s glitzy first state dinner at the White House on 24 November. Playing the part to the full, they arrived in a chauffer-driven stretch SUV, she a beautiful blonde in a striking red sari-style silk dress (in polite tribute to guest of honour President Manmohan Singh of India), he in a dapper dinner jacket. Putting on an air of supreme confidence, the glamorous couple swept into the White House and past the first security checkpoint with nary a sideward glance. Evidently the three uniformed Secret Service officers manning the desk felt too intimidated to confirm their identities against the guest list. Then, once the Salahis had gone through the metal-detector to check for guns, they were in.
Their final act was to post a few photographs of their adventure on Michaele’s Facebook page. Needless to say, there was uproar when the story came out.
Mark Sullivan, the grim-looking director of the Secret Service was hauled before the Congressional Committee on Homeland Security to explain himself. He testified that the security breach was the fault of the Secret Service, and that the agency was deeply embarrassed. But he went on to blame the lapse entirely on the the three hapless Secret Service personnel at the guard post who had since been sent on “administrative leave”. He put it all down to “human error”, rejecting any notion that it might be symptomatic of a series of management deficiencies. “The security break down was not an institutional problem. I believe it is an isolated incident,” Sullivan declared. He is almost certainly wrong. Such mishaps never occur in isolation and can never be attributed to a single factor. Industrial psychology research repeatedly demonstrates that incidents are caused
Therefore no investigation of an incident should exclude a very deep look at the culture of the organization in which it occurred. As I indicated some years ago (“ In the gatecrasher case, institutional contributory factors identified by journalist Ronald Kessler who has written a book about the President’s secret service, include:
According to Mr Kessler, overworked, underappreciated, and infuriated by senseless transfer policies, agents are resigning in increasing numbers, forcing the agency to hire inexperienced, less-qualified agents. Within the Uniformed Division alone, the attrition rate is 12% a year. Mr Sullivan would be far wiser to delve into these kinds of areas than try to slide out of any meaningful action by blaming it all on a convenient case of “human error”. Otherwise Mr Obama should remove him forthwith from his position as Secret Service boss as it means he has become a menace and a threat to the President’s security.
Issue 200’s Comments to Cyberspace Half-a-dozen varied comments during my over-long absence.
- - - - - J I H A D - - - - - Quote: “[US] Department of Defense should allow Muslim Soldiers the option of being released as ‘Conscientious Objectors’ to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events.”
Nidal Hasan, US Major and Islamic Jihadist
murderer, Quote: “Her efforts were superb ... She happened to encounter the gunman. In an exchange of gunfire, she was wounded but managed to wound him four times. It was an amazing and aggressive performance by this police officer.”
US Army Colonel John Rossi and Lieutenant-General Bob Cone
Quote: “These are men and women who have made the selfless and courageous decision to risk, and at times, give their lives to protect us. It’s difficult enough when we lose these brave men and women overseas. It is horrifying when we lose them on American soil.”
A moving tribute by president Obama Thirty more people were injured before Sgt Munley thankfully shot him. Quote: “Nidal Hassan is a hero ... The only way a Muslim can justify serving in the US military is if he intends to follow in the footsteps of men like Nidal ... The American Muslims who condemned his actions have committed treason against the Muslim Ummah and have fallen into hypocrisy.” Anwar al Awlakia, a radical American imam living in Yemen,
Quote: “Some [Guantánamo] detainees would rather stay put than go on trial in the US, where they would probably receive a life sentence or could wait years for a death sentence to be carried out. They know there will not be the same privileges as here. Given the choice of being sentenced forever in Guantánamo or moved to a Supermax [gaol within the US], it is ‘no, can I stay in Gitmo?’. Here they can be outside, they can smell the sea.” An Arab American cultural adviser, Seems Guantánamo is not so bad after all. Maybe that’s why Attorney General Eric Holder Quote: “I’m concerned that this increased speculation could cause a backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers. And I’ve asked our Army leaders to be on the lookout for that.”
With such priorities, General George Casey, Quote: “Where there are no Muslims, the problem of jihadist terrorism does not exist either.” Astute observation by Irish columnist and polemicist Kevin Myers.
He reminds his readers that neither of these
entities exist in - - - - - O B A M A - - - - Quote: “Few would have foreseen ... that a united Germany would be led by a woman from Brandenburg or that their American ally would be led by a man of African descent.”
President Barack Obama makes clear, Quote: “Brazil, Japan, China, Russia and Israel are all countries [which] have come to see Obama as a diffident, dithering, doubting dilettante who can be dissed with impunity.”
Ouch! Former presidential aspirant Pat Buchanan
- - - - - E U - - - - - Quote: “The year 2009 will mark the first year of global governance.”
Herman Van Rompuy, the new king of the EU, - - - - - S P O R T - - - - -
Quote:
“I've let my wife down, I've let my family down (and he's let his
trousers down).”
Droll headline in the (Irish edition of) The
Sun, commenting on Quote: “They [the Football Association of Ireland] have asked very humbly ... can’t we be team number 33 in the world cup. Yes, they have asked for it really!”
Sepp Blatter, president of FIFA, mocks - to
widespread laughter -
How exactly a knockout tournament was to have
been staged The FAI only managed to make itself - and Ireland - look ridiculous.
Jockey Eddie Power, who was photographed - - - - - J O C U L A R R A C I S M - - - - -
Acceptable
Comedienne Miranda Hart
Unacceptable (first
half, anyway)
Andrew Neill, host for the TV show
“This Week in Politics”,
- - - - E N I G M A - - - - - -
Quote (and
here):
I am returning Assembly Bill 1176 without my signature.
For some time now I have
lamented the fact that major issues are overlooked while many
Yet another legislative year has
come and gone without the major reforms Californians Sincerely, Arnold Schwarzenegger” California governor Schwarzenegger Seeing
red, the letter also secretly expresses
his disdain
“My goodness. What a coincidence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| See the Archive and Blogroll at top left and right, for your convenience |
They
mingled among the 338 guests, a
And
as the guests were eventually called for dinner, the two gate-crashers
discreetly departed the scene to avoid being rumbled as obviously there
was no place set for them at the table. 
Now, for a little [Light Relief]
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gift Idea |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Good to report that as at
FREED AT LAST, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BLOGROLL
Atlantic Blog (defunct) Blog-Irish (defunct)
Jihad
Religion
Iona Institute
Leisure
Blog Directory
My Columns in the
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What I've recently
But it's not
entirely honest in its subtle pro-Palestinian bias, and therefore needs
to be read in conjunction with an antidote, such as See detailed review +++++
BP's ambitious CEO John Browne expanded it through adventurous acquisitions, aggressive offshore exploration, and relentless cost-reduction that trumped everything else, even safety and long-term technical sustainability. Thus mistakes accumulated, leading to terrifying and deadly accidents in refineries, pipelines and offshore operations, and business disaster in Russia. The Macondo blowout was but an inevitable outcome of a BP culture that had become poisonous and incompetent. However the book is gravely compromised by a litany of over 40 technical and stupid errors that display the author's ignorance and carelessness. It would be better to wait for the second (properly edited) edition before buying. As for BP, only a wholesale rebuilding of a new, professional, ethical culture will prevent further such tragedies and the eventual destruction of a once mighty corporation with a long and generally honourable history. Note: I wrote
my own reports on Macondo +++++
A horrific account of:
More details on my blog here. +++++
After recounting a childhood of convention and simple pleasures in working-class Aberdeen, Mr Urquhart is conscripted within days of Chamberlain declaring war on Germany in 1939. From then until the Japanese are deservedly nuked into surrendering six years later, Mr Urquhart’s tale is one of first discomfort but then following the fall of Singapore of ever-increasing, unmitigated horror. After a wretched journey Eastward, he finds himself part of Singapore’s big but useless garrison. Taken prisoner when Singapore falls in 1941, he is, successively,
Chronically ill, distraught and traumatised on return to Aberdeen yet disdained by the British Army, he slowly reconstructs a life. Only in his late 80s is he able finally to recount his dreadful experiences in this unputdownable book. There are very few first-person eye-witness accounts of the the horrors of Japanese brutality during WW2. As such this book is an invaluable historical document. +++++
This is a rattling good tale of the web of corruption within which the American president and his cronies operate. It's written by blogger Michele Malkin who, because she's both a woman and half-Asian, is curiously immune to the charges of racism and sexism this book would provoke if written by a typical Republican WASP. With 75 page of notes to back up - in best blogger tradition - every shocking and in most cases money-grubbing allegation, she excoriates one Obama crony after another, starting with the incumbent himself and his equally tricky wife. Joe Biden, Rahm Emmanuel, Valerie Jarett, Tim Geithner, Lawrence Summers, Steven Rattner, both Clintons, Chris Dodd: they all star as crooks in this venomous but credible book. ACORN, Mr Obama's favourite community organising outfit, is also exposed for the crooked vote-rigging machine it is. +++++
It is really just a collation of amusing little tales about surprising human (and occasionally animal) behaviour and situations. For example:
The book has no real message other than don't be surprised how humans sometimes behave and try to look for simple rather than complex solutions. And with a final anecdote (monkeys, cash and sex), the book suddenly just stops dead in its tracks. Weird. ++++++
It's chapters are organised around provocative questions such as
It's central thesis is that economic development continues to be impeded in different countries for different historical reasons, even when the original rationale for those impediments no longer obtains. For instance:
The author writes in a very chatty, light-hearted matter which makes the book easy to digest. However it would benefit from a few charts to illustrate some of the many quantitative points put forward, as well as sub-chaptering every few pages to provide natural break-points for the reader. +++++
The author was a member of Britain's V Force, a forerunner of the SAS. Its remit was to harass Japanese lines of command, patrol their occupied territory, carryout sabotage and provide intelligence, with the overall objective of keeping the enemy out of India. Irwin is admirably yet brutally frank, in his descriptions of deathly battles with the Japs, his execution of a prisoner, dodging falling bags of rice dropped by the RAF, or collapsing in floods of tears through accumulated stress, fear and loneliness. He also provides some fascinating insights into the mentality of Japanese soldiery and why it failed against the flexibility and devolved authority of the British. The book amounts to a very human and exhilarating tale. Oh, and Irwin describes the death in 1943 of his colleague my uncle, Major PF Brennan. +++++ Other books here |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
After
48
crackling, compelling, captivating games, the new World Champions are,
deservedly,
England get the Silver,
No-one can argue with
Over the competition, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
